Mundy v. State

745 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1999 WL 683127
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 3, 1999
DocketNo. 99-2540
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 745 So. 2d 351 (Mundy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mundy v. State, 745 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1999 WL 683127 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David Lee Mundy petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus, contending that his appellate counsel was ineffective in providing advice as to the deadline for filing a motion for postconviction relief. However, we find that petitioner has an adequate legal remedy on this particular issue by appeal from an order denying postconviction relief as untimely. Such an appeal is currently before this court in case number 99-1486. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

BOOTH, ALLEN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borroto v. State
939 So. 2d 1138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Turner v. State
745 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
745 So. 2d 351, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11851, 1999 WL 683127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mundy-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.