Barker v. Stoli Group (USA), LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Jonathan Barker, No. 2:20-cv-02170-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. Stoli Group (USA), LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The motion for leave to file redacted documents, ECF No. 21, is denied without 18 | prejudice to renewal. Any renewed motion must be supported by information that would permit 19 | this court to find “a compelling reason” to withhold information from the public and to 20 | “articulate[] the factual basis for [that] ruling, without relying on hypothesis or conjecture.” Ctr. 21 | for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096-97 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting 22 | Kamakana vy. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006)). 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 DATED: September 22, 2021.