Barker v. Hardway

399 F.2d 638
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 3, 1968·No. No. 12600·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After the appellants, students at Blue-field State College, violently protested the policies of the college’s administrative officers, they were suspended. The district judge refused to order their reinstatement setting forth his reasons in an opinion which we find to be supported by the record and to apply correct principles of law. Barker v. Hardway, 283 F.Supp. 228 (S.D.W.Va.1968).

We believe the district judge correctly concluded that the administrative appeals which the college afforded the students satisfied the requirements of due process of law. In any event, the district judge granted them a plenary, de novo hearing with counsel. It was upon evidence received at this hearing that he based his own findings concerning the conduct that lead to their suspension. The proceedings in the district court render moot the students’ contention that they were denied due process at the college level.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barker v. Hardway, 399 F.2d 638 (4th Cir. 1968).

399 F.2d 638 (Barker v. Hardway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sohmer v. Kinnard
535 F. Supp. 50 (D. Maryland, 1982)
Center for Participant Education v. Marshall
337 F. Supp. 126 (N.D. Florida, 1972)
James v. West Virginia Board of Regents
322 F. Supp. 217 (S.D. West Virginia, 1971)
Sword v. Fox
317 F. Supp. 1055 (W.D. Virginia, 1970)
Saunders v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute
417 F.2d 1127 (Fourth Circuit, 1969)
Esteban v. Central Missouri State College
415 F.2d 1077 (Eighth Circuit, 1969)
Barker v. Hardway
399 F.2d 638 (Fourth Circuit, 1968)