Barjona J. Meek and Roberta L. Meek v. United States

Federal Circuit

Barjona J. Meek and Roberta L. Meek v. United States

6 F.3d 788

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedDecember 27, 1993

Docket93-5043

StatusPublished

This text of 6 F.3d 788 (Barjona J. Meek and Roberta L. Meek v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barjona J. Meek and Roberta L. Meek v. United States, 6 F.3d 788 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

6 F.3d 788
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Barjona J. MEEK and Roberta L. Meek, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-5043.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1993.
Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc
Declined Dec. 27, 1993.

Before PLAGER, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims in Meek v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 1357 (1992), denying appellants recovery, is affirmed, for the reasons stated in that court's opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI