Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.
101 F.3d 367, 1996 WL 681476
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 26, 1996·No. No. 94-20498·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
FOR THE COURT:
By virtue of an equally divided en banc court, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., 101 F.3d 367, 1996 WL 681476 (5th Cir. 1996).
101 F.3d 367 (Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Juan Sandoval Lopez v. Mike Pompeo, Secretary, et
923 F.3d 444 (Fifth Circuit, 2019)
Jefferson v. Community Bank (In re Jefferson)
477 B.R. 645 (S.D. Mississippi, 2012)
Thompson v. Florida Bar
526 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (S.D. Florida, 2007)
Harris v. New York State Department of Health
202 F. Supp. 2d 143 (S.D. New York, 2002)
Victor C. Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., Caltex Petroleum, Inc.
101 F.3d 367 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)