Barefoot v. Ellis

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2007·No. 07-6309·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6309

CHARLES ROBERT BAREFOOT, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KEITH D. ELLIS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:06-CT-03123-D)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: June 21, 2007

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district

court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)

complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

See Barefoot v. Ellis, No. 5:06-CT-03123-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13,

2007). We deny Barefoot’s motion for appointment of CJA counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barefoot v. Ellis, (4th Cir. 2007).

Barefoot v. Ellis (Barefoot v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)