Barefoot v. Ellis

Fourth Circuit

Barefoot v. Ellis

230 F. App'x 314

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 21, 2007·No. No. 07-6309·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) [315]*315(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barefoot v. Ellis, No. 5:06-CT-03123-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2007). We deny Barefoot’s motion for appointment of CJA counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr., appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) [315]*315(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Barefoot v. Ellis, No. 5:06-CT-03123-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 2007). We deny Barefoot’s motion for appointment of CJA counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Barefoot v. Ellis, 230 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

230 F. App'x 314 (Barefoot v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related