Bardis v. Stinson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Bardis v. Stinson

134 A.3d 27, 224 N.J. 448, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 334

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedApril 27, 2016

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 A.3d 27 (Bardis v. Stinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bardis v. Stinson, 134 A.3d 27, 224 N.J. 448, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 334 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the Law Division’s judgment is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Sapp-Peterson’s dissenting opinion, reported at 444 N.J.Super. 227, 240, 132 A.3d 930 (App.Div.2014) (Sapp-Peterson, P.J.A.D., dissenting).

For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 6. Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is reversed, and the Law Division’s judgment is reinstated, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Sapp-Peterson’s dissenting opinion, reported at 444 N.J.Super. 227, 240, 132 A.3d 930 (App.Div.2014) (Sapp-Peterson, P.J.A.D., dissenting).

For Reversal — Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, SOLOMON and Judge CUFF (temporarily assigned) — 6. Not Participating — Justice FERNANDEZ-VINA.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.3d 27, 224 N.J. 448, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bardis-v-stinson-nj-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack