Barco v. Barco

34 So. 2d 879, 160 Fla. 389, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 754
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 20, 1948·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a final decree granting a divorce •and awarding alimony, etc., to the wife, the appellant in this «controversy. We have studied the record in light of the contentions of counsel for the respective parties but have failed to find error in the record. The disputes and conflicts in the testimony as settled by the final decree have not been shown to be clearly erroneous. It is our conclusion that the cause should be affirmed on authority of Stewart v. Stewart, ...... Fla. ......, 29 So. (2nd) 247.

The appellant through counsel has filed a petition for the allowance of counsel fees for services rendered incident to this appeal, and, after consideration thereof, the same is granted and the amount thereof fixed at the sum of $350.00.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, ADAMS, SEBRING and BARNS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barco v. Barco, 34 So. 2d 879, 160 Fla. 389, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 754 (Fla. 1948).

34 So. 2d 879 (Barco v. Barco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Thompson
212 S.W.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1948)