Stewart v. Stewart
Opinions
A perusal of the record in this case has led us to the conviction that the master and the chancellor ruled correctly on all issues involved except the one whether the appellee Glenn *327 Stewart had heen guilty of adultery as charged in the answer. We are of the opinion that this misconduct on his part was established and that, both parties being at fault, the case should have been dismissed.
It is, therefore, the order of this court that the final decree be reversed with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint and the counterclaim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
29 So. 2d 247 (Stewart v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.