Barber v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barber v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F.3d 1148
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 12, 1994·No. 94-1804·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


December 12, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 94-1804

RICHARD BARBER,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Frank H. Freedman, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge, and ____________________
Boudin, Circuit Judge. _____________

____________________

Richard I. Barber on brief pro se. _________________
Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Kevin O'Regan, _________________ ______________
Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. The denial of appellant's motion ___________

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 is affirmed for essentially the ________

reasons contained in the district court's Memorandum and

Order dated July 12, 1994.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. United States, (1st Cir. 1994).

Barber v. United States (Barber v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.