Barber v. United States

42 F.3d 1384, 1994 WL 690521
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barber v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F.3d 1148
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 12, 1994·No. 94-1804·Unpublished

Opinion

42 F.3d 1384

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.
Richard BARBER, Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent, Appellee.

No. 94-1804

United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1994

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts [Hon. Frank H. Freedman, U.S. District Judge ]

Richard I. Barber on brief pro se.

Donald K. Stern, United States Attorney, and Kevin O'Regan, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.

Per Curiam.

The denial of appellant's motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is affirmed for essentially the reasons contained in the district court's Memorandum and Order dated July 12, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. United States, 42 F.3d 1384, 1994 WL 690521 (1st Cir. 1994).

42 F.3d 1384 (Barber v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.