Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Barber v. State

Barber v. State

562 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4461, 1990 WL 83619
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1990·No. No. 89-566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We affirm. It was within the trial court’s discretion to refuse the defendant examination concerning an alleged prior inconsistent statement of the witness where it was made clear to the court in advance that counsel for the defendant would not offer evidence to prove the inconsistency.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barber v. State, 562 So. 2d 445, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4461, 1990 WL 83619 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

562 So. 2d 445 (Barber v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Cape Canaveral v. Rich
562 So. 2d 445 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)