Barber v. Pettiford
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7428
ANTONIO BARBER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
M. PETTIFORD, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Bennettsville SCP,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-05-1666-CMC)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 26, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Barber, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Antonio Barber appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Pettiford,
No. CA-05-1666-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber v. Pettiford (Barber v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.