Barber v. Pettiford
182 F. App'x 252
Opinion
Antonio Barber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Pettiford, No. CA-05-1666-CMC (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barber v. Pettiford, 182 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2006).
182 F. App'x 252 (Barber v. Pettiford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241