Barbarula v. Haniewski, No. Cv 97 0437585 S (Apr. 23, 2002)
This text of 2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5421 (Barbarula v. Haniewski, No. Cv 97 0437585 S (Apr. 23, 2002)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Section
After trial the court shall examine the record to determine whether the plaintiff made an "offer of judgment" which the defendant failed to accept. If the court ascertains from the record that the plaintiff has recovered an amount equal to or greater than the sum certain stated in his "offer of judgment", the court shall add to the amount so recovered twelve per cent annual interest on said amount, computed from the date such offer was filed in actions commenced before October 1, 1981. In those actions commenced on or after October 1, 1981, the interest shall be computed from the date the complaint in the civil action was filed with the court if the "offer of judgment" was filed not later than eighteen months from the filing of such complaint. If such offer was filed later than eighteen months from the date of filing of the complaint, the interest shall be computed from the date the "offer of judgment" was filed. The court may award reasonable attorney's fees in an amount not to exceed three hundred fifty dollars, and shall render judgment accordingly. This section shall not be interpreted to abrogate the contractual rights of any party concerning the recovery of attorney's fees in accordance with the provisions of any written contract between the parties to the action.
The Court has examined the file pursuant to Section
After the completion of the trial of this matter the jury rendered a verdict of three million six hundred thousand dollars ($3,600,000.00). The verdict rendered is in excess of the amount in the Offer of Judgment.
Applying a simple interest rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum and using an accounting year consisting of three hundred and sixty days (360), the per diem on the aforementioned amount is one thousand two hundred dollars ($1,200.00) or four hundred thirty two thousand dollars per year ($432,000.00).
The date of the verdict in this matter was November 29, 2001. A total of one thousand six hundred and five (1,605) days passed since the filing of the instant action and the rendering of a verdict. The total interest as of the date of the verdict was one million nine hundred twenty six thousand dollars ($1,926,000.00).
A total of one thousand seven hundred and seventeen days (1,717) passed between the filing of the complaint and the date of the motion to reopen, (March 21, 2002) therefore as of that date the interest due on the judgment was two million sixty thousand four hundred dollars ($2,060,400.00).
As of today's date, a total of one thousand seven hundred and fifty days (1,750) have passed since the filing of the Complaint in this matter. The total interest as of today is therefore two million one hundred thousand dollars, ($2,100,000.00) this amount, plus the aforementioned verdict amount equals a total of five million seven hundred thousand dollars ($5,700,000.00).
The Plaintiff's motion to reopen the judgment is granted. Final judgment may enter in the amount of five million seven hundred thousand dollars ($5,700,000.00).
Richard A. Robinson, J April 23, 2002
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barbarula-v-haniewski-no-cv-97-0437585-s-apr-23-2002-connsuperct-2002.