Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Barabas v. Rojas

Barabas v. Rojas

481 So. 2d 1004, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 292, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barabas v. Rojas. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6045 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1986·No. No. 84-2430·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reversed the judgment in Case No. 84-857 in favor of the appellees, Alirio Rojas, M.D., and Alirio Rojas, M.D., P.A., and remanded for a new trial on the merits, it follows that attorney’s fees awarded to appellees as prevailing parties in a malpractice action under Section 768.56, Florida Statutes (1983), must also be reversed.

Reversed.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barabas v. Rojas, 481 So. 2d 1004, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 292, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6071 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

481 So. 2d 1004 (Barabas v. Rojas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.