Barabas v. Rojas

481 So. 2d 1003, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6045
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1986
DocketNo. 84-857
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 481 So. 2d 1003 (Barabas v. Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barabas v. Rojas, 481 So. 2d 1003, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold, under the facts of this case, that it was reversible error for the trial court to refuse to give the jury the charge on concurrent causes as found in Standard Jury Instruction 5.1(b). Tilley v. Broward Hospital District, 458 So.2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Higgins v. Johnson, 434 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) and Goodman v. Becker, 430 So.2d 560 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). [1004]*1004The remaining appellate points are without merit.

We reverse and remand for a new trial.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., and WES-SEL, JOHN D., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zigman v. Cline
664 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
First Union National Bank v. Allen Lorey Family Ltd. Partnership
34 Va. Cir. 474 (Fairfax County Circuit Court, 1994)
Holman ex rel. Holman v. Goldschmidt
550 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 So. 2d 1003, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barabas-v-rojas-fladistctapp-1986.