Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Italiano

494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 204, 24 Ohio B. 431, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 673
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 2, 1986·No. D.D. No. 86-2·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A review and examination of the record indicates that respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3) and (5), and DR 7-102 (A)(7) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. New acts are more reprehensible, [205]*205under the circumstances of this case, than the attempted bribery of a police officer. We are therefore compelled to adopt the findings and recommendation of the board.

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the 'state of Ohio for an indefinite period.

Judgment accordingly.

Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Italiano, 494 N.E.2d 1113, 24 Ohio St. 3d 204, 24 Ohio B. 431, 1986 Ohio LEXIS 673 (Ohio 1986).

494 N.E.2d 1113 (Bar Ass'n of Greater Cleveland v. Italiano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez
2016 Ohio 2709 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Sinclair
2004 Ohio 7014 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)