Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States

Federal Circuit

Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States

858 F.2d 742, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541, 1988 WL 102545

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedOctober 4, 1988

Docket88-1217

StatusPublished

This text of 858 F.2d 742 (Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States, 858 F.2d 742, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541, 1988 WL 102545 (Fed. Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

858 F.2d 742

10 ITRD 1816

BANTAM TRAVELWARE, DIV. OF PETER'S BAG CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-1217.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Oct. 4, 1988.

Appealed from U.S. Court of International Trade; Tsoucalas, Judge.

Judith M. Barzilay, Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief, was Brian S. Goldstein, New York City.

James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Before MAYER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges, and NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 679 F.Supp. 8 (1987), is affirmed on the basis of the court's opinion, which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI