Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States

858 F.2d 742, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541, 1988 WL 102545
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 4, 1988·No. 88-1217·Published

Opinion

858 F.2d 742

10 ITRD 1816

BANTAM TRAVELWARE, DIV. OF PETER'S BAG CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-1217.

United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.

Oct. 4, 1988.

Appealed from U.S. Court of International Trade; Tsoucalas, Judge.

Judith M. Barzilay, Siegel, Mandell & Davidson, P.C., of New York City, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief, was Brian S. Goldstein, New York City.

James A. Curley, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief, were John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Before MAYER and MICHEL, Circuit Judges, and NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 679 F.Supp. 8 (1987), is affirmed on the basis of the court's opinion, which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States, 858 F.2d 742, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13541, 1988 WL 102545 (Fed. Cir. 1988).

858 F.2d 742 (Bantam Travelware, Div. Of Peter's Bag Corp. v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bantam Travelware, Division of Peter's Bag Corp. v. United States
11 Ct. Int'l Trade 893 (Court of International Trade, 1987)
Bantam Travelware v. United States
858 F.2d 742 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
Unisys Corp. v. United States
488 U.S. 854 (Supreme Court, 1988)