Bannum, Inc. v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5064
BANNUM, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee,
and
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Michael A. Gordon, Michael A. Gordon PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
Delisa M. Sanchez, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee United States. With her on the brief were Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson, Director, and Deborah A. Bynum, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Dionis M. Gauvin, Attorney Advisor, Office of the General Counsel, Commercial Law Branch, Federal Bureau of Prisons, of Washington, DC.
Daniel S. Herzfeld, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee Dismas Charities, Inc. With him on the brief were Alex D. Tomaszczuk and Orest J. Jowyk.
Appealed from: United States Court of Federal Claims
Senior Judge John P. Wiese NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5064
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
in CASE NO(S). 09-CV-015
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (LOURIE, RADER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED November 5, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bannum, Inc. v. United States (Bannum, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.