Bannum, Inc. v. United States
This text of Bannum, Inc. v. United States (Bannum, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BANNUM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
and
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
____________________
2011-5052 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-479, Judge Susan G. Braden. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOSEPH A. CAMARDO, JR., Camardo Law Firm, P.C., of Auburn, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
DAVID P. OLIVER, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appelle United States. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM, Assistant Director. ALEX D. TOMASZCZUK, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee Dismas Charities, Inc. With him on the brief were DANIEL S. HERZFELD and NICOLE Y. BEELER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bannum, Inc. v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannum-inc-v-united-states-cafc-2012.