Bannum, Inc. v. United States
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
BANNUM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
and
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
2011-5052
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 10-CV-479, Judge Susan G. Braden.
JUDGMENT
JOSEPH A. CAMARDO, JR., Camardo Law Firm, P.C., of Auburn, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
DAVID P. OLIVER, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appelle United States. With him on the brief were TONY WEST, Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, and STEVEN J. GILLINGHAM, Assistant Director.
ALEX D. TOMASZCZUK, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee Dismas Charities, Inc. With him on the brief were DANIEL S. HERZFELD and NICOLE Y. BEELER.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bannum, Inc. v. United States (Bannum, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.