Bannister v. Shepherd

4 S.E.2d 7, 191 S.C. 165, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 81
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 20, 1939
Docket14921
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 4 S.E.2d 7 (Bannister v. Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bannister v. Shepherd, 4 S.E.2d 7, 191 S.C. 165, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 81 (S.C. 1939).

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 167 July 20, 1939. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The case arose under the South Carolina Workmen's Compensation Law. The full Commission made an award, which upon appeal to the Circuit Court was affirmed in an order by his Honor Wm. H. Grimball. After notice of intention to appeal from this order had been served, the claimant moved to require the appellants to comply with the award. Over the objection of the appellants, his Honor G. Duncan Bellinger filed an order directing the insurance carrier, American Mutual Liability Insurance Company, to pay the award pending the appeal. The case comes before us upon appeal from both of these orders.

The facts and circumstances giving rise to this litigation are fully set forth in the orders appealed from. We have given full and careful consideration to the issues involved, and are satisfied with the disposition made of those issues by the Circuit Court. In our opinion, that Court correctly decided the case. Let the order of Judge Grimball and the order of Judge Bellinger be reported.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE STABLER, MESSRS. JUSTICES BONHAM and BAKER and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE A.L. GASTON concur. *Page 177

MR. JUSTICE CARTER did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Synovus Bank v. Huffer
D. South Carolina, 2021
Randolph v. FISKE-CARTER CONSTRUCTION CO.
125 S.E.2d 267 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1962)
Case v. Hermitage Cotton Mills
115 S.E.2d 57 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
Bagwell v. ERNEST BURWELL, INC.
87 S.E.2d 583 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1955)
St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Sylvan
213 F.2d 137 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)
Miller v. SPRINGS COTTON MILLS
82 S.E.2d 458 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)
Sylvan v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co.
116 F. Supp. 601 (D. South Carolina, 1953)
Parker v. State Highway Department
78 S.E.2d 382 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
State & Port Authority v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
22 N.W.2d 569 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1946)
King v. Wesner
16 S.E.2d 289 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Cokeley v. Robert Lee, Inc.
14 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1941)
Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal
109 P.2d 942 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
McDonald v. Palmetto Theaters
11 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.E.2d 7, 191 S.C. 165, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannister-v-shepherd-sc-1939.