Bannister Bank & Trust v. American Title Insurance Co. v. Maxie Higgason Thor Bahrman, Third-Party

852 F.2d 1287, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10075, 1988 WL 79677
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 1988
Docket88-5544
StatusUnpublished

This text of 852 F.2d 1287 (Bannister Bank & Trust v. American Title Insurance Co. v. Maxie Higgason Thor Bahrman, Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bannister Bank & Trust v. American Title Insurance Co. v. Maxie Higgason Thor Bahrman, Third-Party, 852 F.2d 1287, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10075, 1988 WL 79677 (3d Cir. 1988).

Opinion

852 F.2d 1287

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
BANNISTER BANK & TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee,
v.
Maxie HIGGASON; Thor Bahrman, Third-Party Defendants.

No. 88-5544.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 28, 1988.

Before MERRITT, KRUPANSKY and BOGGS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The defendant appeals from orders entering judgment for the plaintiff on the issue of liability and for the defendant on the issue of damages. The district court's orders further directed supplemental briefing on the defendants third-party complaint. The third-party complaint remains pending before the district court.

A judgment is final for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 "when it terminates all issues presented in the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing to be done except to enforce by execution what has been determined." Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc., 434 F.2d 619, 620 (6th Cir.1970) (per curiam ). Absent certification for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam ); Oak Construction Co. v. Huron Cement Co., 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam ). The orders appealed from were neither final nor certified for interlocutory appeal. Accordingly,

It is ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis D. Donovan v. Hayden, Stone, Inc.
434 F.2d 619 (Sixth Circuit, 1970)
Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company
475 F.2d 1220 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States
575 F.2d 101 (Sixth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
852 F.2d 1287, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 10075, 1988 WL 79677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bannister-bank-trust-v-american-title-insurance-co-v-maxie-higgason-ca3-1988.