Bankston v. State
189 S.W.2d 481, 189 S.W. 481, 80 Tex. Crim. 287, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 324
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bankston v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 80 Tex. Crim. 629 →
Opinions
This is a conviction for misdemeanor theft. The statement of facts and bills of exception were filed nineteen days after the term of court adjourned without any order allowing the statement of facts to be filed after adjournment. The Assistant Attorney General’s motion to strike them out on that account must, therefore, be granted. Without these no question is presented which we can review.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bankston v. State, 189 S.W.2d 481, 189 S.W. 481, 80 Tex. Crim. 287, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 324 (Tex. 1916).
189 S.W.2d 481 (Bankston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. State
29 S.W. 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)
Suesberry v. State
162 S.W. 849 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Quarles v. State
39 S.W. 668 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)