Lewis v. State
29 S.W. 384, 34 Tex. Crim. 126, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1895·No. No. 535.·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinions
Appellant was convicted for playing craps, a game played with dice. The statement of facts, having been filed after the adjournment of court for the term, can not be considered, because the record fails to show an order for that purpose. The sole ground urged for reversal is the want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lewis v. State, 29 S.W. 384, 34 Tex. Crim. 126, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39 (Tex. 1895).
29 S.W. 384 (Lewis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
28 S.W.2d 794 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Bankston v. State
189 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Suesberry v. State
162 S.W. 849 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Mayhew v. State
155 S.W. 191 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Offield, Alias James v. State
135 S.W. 566 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Nichols v. State
115 S.W. 1196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Reed v. State
61 S.W. 925 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1901)
Morse v. State
47 S.W. 645 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Dement v. State
45 S.W. 917 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Sheegog v. State
44 S.W. 1109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1898)
Youngman v. State
42 S.W. 988 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Quarles v. State
39 S.W. 668 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)