Lewis v. State
This text of 29 S.W. 384 (Lewis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted for playing craps, a game played with dice. The statement of facts, having been filed after the adjournment of court for the term, can not be considered, because the record fails to show an order for that purpose. The sole ground urged for reversal is the want of sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.W. 384, 34 Tex. Crim. 126, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lewis-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.