Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Christie

72 A.D.2d 614, 420 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1979·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 16, 1978 in Ulster County, upon an order which granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment against the defendant, Gerald A. Christie, in the sum of $33,686.09. Upon reargument, we adhere to our previous decision (Bankers Trust Hudson Val., N. A. v Christie, 68 AD2d 969) holding that questions of fact are here presented which require reversal of the judgment granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. In our view, neither subdivisions 1 and 4 of section 15-301 of the General Obligations Law nor Chemical Bank v Wasserman (37 NY2d 249) requires a contrary holding in view of the Court of Appeals application of the equitable estoppel principle in a similar context (Rose v Spa Realty Assoc., 42 NY2d 338). Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Christie, 72 A.D.2d 614, 420 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

72 A.D.2d 614 (Bankers Trust Hudson Valley v. Christie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Madison Avenue Leasehold, LLC v. Madison Bentley Associates LLC
30 A.D.3d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Endicott Trust Co. v. Milasi
175 A.D.2d 480 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
NAT'L BANK OF N. AM. v. Paskow
424 N.E.2d 277 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
National Bank of North America v. Paskow
424 N.E.2d 277 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)