Bankers & Merchants Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Stapp

14 S.W. 168, 77 Tex. 517, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1162
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 3, 1890
DocketNo. 6442
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 14 S.W. 168 (Bankers & Merchants Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Stapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bankers & Merchants Mutual Benefit Ass'n v. Stapp, 14 S.W. 168, 77 Tex. 517, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1162 (Tex. 1890).

Opinion

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

—On August 17, 1886, W. S. Stapp died, holding a certificate of membership in appellant corporation, which in terms entitled appellee to 85000 on the death of her husband. On the death of the husband the company refused to pay, and this action was brought.

The defenses urged were that the deceased had failed to pay the sum of 810 as a fee for membership required to be paid before membership could exist or the certificate be operative, and that he during life had failed to pay a mortuary assessment of 86.65, made on August 2, 1886,- of which notice on that day was mailed from the home office in San Francisco, California, to Sherman, Texas, the residence of the deceased.

The certificate of membership bears date March 20, 1886, but it was not delivered until some time after May 23 of same year, when it was sent to deceased, who was agent for the corporation at Sherman, Texas, in pursuance of a letter of that date, which contained the following language: “ Why has my policy never been sent me? 'Tis true that I have not been making much money since I have been here, but have always had 810 to pay my dues.”

The certificate of membership provides that “This certificate of membership is not binding until the first payments due thereunder shall have been fully received in cash by the association or some agent authorized to receive the same and during the life of said member.”

Appellant's general manager wrote to Stapp July 14, 1886, “Again 1 [520]*520call your attention to reporting back business, including your own premium. If you don’t want your certificate send it back; it is no earthly good to you without premium paid.”

He again wrote on July 20, 1886: “We have forwarded certificates to the amount of §123,000. We have received remittances from you of $171, leaving a balance due us of $75, independent of your own certificate, upon which there is due $10. We have credited up May certificates as paid on our books; amount $136; leaving a balance to credit of June certificates to the amount of $35, which we will credit on return of this report with advices. Please remit the full amount at your earliest convenience, and let us make a new start and keep matters in proper shape in the future.”

The last letter written by Manager Allen, dated August 16, 1886, did not arrive until after Stapp’s death. Among other things it says: “ Then there is your own policy not paid for, issued on the 20th day of March, and you being sick, as your clerk informs us, we could not receive payment for same until you regain your health and be examined, as typhoid fever tends to undermine a person’s constitution.”

J. B. Thurmond, appellant’s secretary during 1886, testified that he never received any money or its equivalent from W. S. Stapp or any other person in payment for the annual dues on the certificate sued on as described in the receipt signed by the witness (being the receipt introduced in evidence by the plaintiff). That the same, if sent, was sent to W. S. Stapp as general agent for collection, the same as though collecting dues from any other person on any other certificate of membership. That Stapp never paid his dues to witness’ knowledge, though often requested so to do. That any of the officers, however, had power to receive and receipt for annual dues. That Stapp did remit certain amounts of money from Texas, but as to their application witness could not state. Didn’t know whether certificate was sent to Stapp in compliance with his request or not. The correspondence of the association was conducted by witness, general manager, and Badlam, the president.”

The annual dues referred to by this witness and others do not relate to the premium or fee for membership, but to an annual payment, in addition to mortuary assessments, of $15, which each member was required to pay on or before March 20 of each year.

The receipt for such dues was offered in evidence by the plaintiff, and was as follows:

“Sam Framcisco, March 20, 1886.
“Received $15 for annual fees, according to the terms and conditions of certificate Ho. 442 on the life of W. S. Stapp, from March 20, 1886, to March 20, 1887.
“To be countersigned by W. S. Stapp.
“J. B. Thurmomd, Secretary.”

[521]*521The certificate of membership declares that “in consideration of the representations, agreements, and warranties made in the application for this certificate of membership, and of the payment of the admission fee, and of 815, being the amount of dues for expenses, to be paid on or before the 20th day of March in each year, and every year during the continuance of this certificate, and of all mortuary assessments as per table endorsed hereon, payable at the home office of the association within thirty days from the date of each notice, the Bankers and Merchants Mutual Life Association of the United States does hereby create and constitute William Sheppard Stapp of Los Angeles, county of Los Angeles, State of California, a member of this association, and issue this certificate of membership, subject to the following agreement.”

At the date of that certificate Stapp was a resident of Los Angeles.

“ R K. Allen, general manager of appellant during 1886, testified that appellant had never received a cent from Stapp in payment of annual dues on certificate Uo. 442 sued on; that the certificate-was sent to Stapp by mail by witness Thurmond, appellant’s secretary, at Stapp’s request, he saying he had the money to pay for it, in answer to Stapp’s letter dated May 23, 1886; that the secretary was the proper party to receive the dues; that witness knew of no other person connected with appellant who ever received said dues; that President Badlam and witness attended to correspondence of appellant after May 23, 1887; that Stapp, though repeatedly urged, had never written a word with reference to the certificate, not even acknowledging its receipt. The partial list of members printed in our circulars was composed of those who had applied for membership. A man who has not paid his annual dues or premium or has not in some satisfactory manner arranged for their payment is not, under the rules of the association, liable to assessments. The money received by appellant from Stapp was on certificates issued to others, not Stapp. Appellant’s business is cash, and no charge for fees was made in Stapp’s case. Stapp’s name was included among those assessed, but he would not only have had to pay the assessments and back dues but would also have had to undergo another medical examination to entitle him to beneficial membership. The notices of assessments are sent to delinquents in order to give them an opportunity to reinstate themselves.”

Badlam, president of appellant, testified that he knew the annual dues were never paid.

The statement of the testimony of the secretary, general manager, and president is taken from brief of counsel for appellant, and although abbreviated is correct.

We understand the witness Allen, however, to say that Stapp never paid any money as premium, annual dues, or on mortuary assessments.

It was agreed that Stapp wrote the letter of date May 23, 1886, and that the letters of July 14 and 20, 1886, were written to him by the gen[522]*522eral manager and deposited in the postoffice at San Francisco for transmission, but there is no evidence whether Stapp received them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amarillo Mut. Benevolent Ass'n v. Franklin
33 S.W.2d 859 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Baker v. Fort Worth Mutual Benevolent Ass'n
280 S.W. 165 (Texas Supreme Court, 1926)
Gaut v. American Legion of Honor
55 L.R.A. 465 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1901)
Southern Cotton-Oil Co. v. Heflin
99 F. 339 (Fifth Circuit, 1900)
Independent Order of Foresters v. Haggerty
86 Ill. App. 31 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Di Messiah v. Gern
30 N.Y.S. 824 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Modern Woodmen of America v. Jameson
48 Kan. 718 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.W. 168, 77 Tex. 517, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bankers-merchants-mutual-benefit-assn-v-stapp-tex-1890.