Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta

986 N.E.2d 1023, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1435

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2013·No. 2013-0310·Published

Opinion

Medina App. No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent. French, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta, 986 N.E.2d 1023, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

986 N.E.2d 1023 (Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

2012 Ohio 5562 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)