Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta

Ohio Supreme Court

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta

986 N.E.2d 1020, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 2013

Docket2013-0304

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 986 N.E.2d 1020 (Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta, 986 N.E.2d 1020, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Medina App. No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed January 22, 2013:

“When a defendant fails to appeal from a trial court’s judgment in a foreclosure action, can a lack of standing be raised as part of a motion for relief from judgment?”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is PNC Bank, N.A. v. Botts, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-256, 2012-Ohio-5383.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Medina App. No. 12CA0025-M, 2012-Ohio-5562. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed January 22, 2013:

“When a defendant fails to appeal from a trial court’s judgment in a foreclosure action, can a lack of standing be raised as part of a motion for relief from judgment?”

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and French, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is PNC Bank, N.A. v. Botts, 10th Dist. No. 12AP-256, 2012-Ohio-5383.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

986 N.E.2d 1020, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-am-na-v-kuchta-ohio-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack