Bangert v. Hubbard
143 N.E.2d 285, 237 Ind. 5, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 242
Opinions
Separate Opinion
I concur in the reasoning of Landis, J. in his dissenting opinion. However, in this case I believe the evidence is such as to bring it within the exception to the rule as stated in The Evanville and Terre Haute Railroad Company v. Talbot (1892), 131 Ind. 221, 29 N. E. 1134, and quoted in the dissenting opinion. In my opinion the Appellate Court reached the right result under the record in this case, and transfer should be denied.
Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 285.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bangert v. Hubbard, 143 N.E.2d 285, 237 Ind. 5, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 242 (Ind. 1957).
143 N.E.2d 285 (Bangert v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Bibber v. Norris
404 N.E.2d 1365 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1980)
Snider v. Lewis
276 N.E.2d 160 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1971)
Wegner v. Rodeo Cowboys Association
290 F. Supp. 369 (D. Colorado, 1968)
Dwyer v. McClean
183 N.E.2d 204 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1962)
Bangert v. Hubbard
143 N.E.2d 285 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Bangert v. Hubbard
126 N.E.2d 778 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1955)