Bangert v. Hubbard
This text of 143 N.E.2d 285 (Bangert v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Separate Opinion
I concur in the reasoning of Landis, J. in his dissenting opinion. However, in this case I believe the evidence is such as to bring it within the exception to the rule as stated in The Evanville and Terre Haute Railroad Company v. Talbot (1892), 131 Ind. 221, 29 N. E. 1134, and quoted in the dissenting opinion. In my opinion the Appellate Court reached the right result under the record in this case, and transfer should be denied.
Note. — Reported in 143 N. E. 2d 285.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 N.E.2d 285, 237 Ind. 5, 1957 Ind. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bangert-v-hubbard-ind-1957.