Bandlow v. Rothman

D.C. Circuit

Bandlow v. Rothman

278 F.2d 866, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 32

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1960

DocketNo. 15279

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 278 F.2d 866 (Bandlow v. Rothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bandlow v. Rothman, 278 F.2d 866, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 32 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants asked the District Court to require the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint charging unfair labor practices. They also sought to compel the Board to set aside the General Counsel’s refusal. This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the District Court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The court was clearly right. It “has no power to order the General Counsel to issue a complaint and no power to require the Board to issue an order in a matter which is not before the Board.” Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316, 317, 201 F.2d 187, 188, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 930, 73 S.Ct. 792, 97 L.Ed. 1359.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants asked the District Court to require the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint charging unfair labor practices. They also sought to compel the Board to set aside the General Counsel’s refusal. This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the District Court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The court was clearly right. It “has no power to order the General Counsel to issue a complaint and no power to require the Board to issue an order in a matter which is not before the Board.” Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316, 317, 201 F.2d 187, 188, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 930, 73 S.Ct. 792, 97 L.Ed. 1359.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 F.2d 866, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandlow-v-rothman-cadc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack