Bandlow v. Rothman

278 F.2d 866, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 32
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 31, 1960·No. No. 15279·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants asked the District Court to require the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board to issue a complaint charging unfair labor practices. They also sought to compel the Board to set aside the General Counsel’s refusal. This appeal is from an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the District Court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The court was clearly right. It “has no power to order the General Counsel to issue a complaint and no power to require the Board to issue an order in a matter which is not before the Board.” Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 316, 317, 201 F.2d 187, 188, certiorari denied 345 U.S. 930, 73 S.Ct. 792, 97 L.Ed. 1359.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bandlow v. Rothman, 278 F.2d 866, 108 U.S. App. D.C. 32 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

278 F.2d 866 (Bandlow v. Rothman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related