Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
This text of 855 F.3d 1128 (Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
This matter is before the court on the Security and Exchange Commission’s Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the petitioner. Upon consideration, the request for panel rehearing is denied by a majority of the original panel members.
The petition and response were also transmitted to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service. Upon that circulation, a poll was called. A majority voted to deny en banc reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Consequently, the en banc request is likewise denied.
Judges Lucero and Moritz voted to grant en banc rehearing. Judge Lucero has written separately in dissent, in which Judge Moritz joins.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
855 F.3d 1128, 2017 WL 1717498, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bandimere-v-united-states-securities-exchange-commission-ca10-2017.