Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission

855 F.3d 1128, 2017 WL 1717498, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8094
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2017·No. 15-9586·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the Security and Exchange Commission’s Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc. We also have a response from the petitioner. Upon consideration, the request for panel rehearing is denied by a majority of the original panel members.

The petition and response were also transmitted to all the judges of the court who are in regular active service. Upon that circulation, a poll was called. A majority voted to deny en banc reconsideration. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a). Consequently, the en banc request is likewise denied.

Judges Lucero and Moritz voted to grant en banc rehearing. Judge Lucero has written separately in dissent, in which Judge Moritz joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission, 855 F.3d 1128, 2017 WL 1717498, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8094 (10th Cir. 2017).

855 F.3d 1128 (Bandimere v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chong McClenning v. Department of the Army
2022 MSPB 3 (Merit Systems Protection Board, 2022)
Abbington v. Berryhill
S.D. Alabama, 2018
Kern v. SEC
Tenth Circuit, 2018