Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. T.P.M. International, Inc.
This text of 500 So. 2d 248 (Banco Industrial De Venezuela, C.A. v. T.P.M. International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed. See Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. v. Fairways Plaza Associates, 412 So.2d 871, 875 (Fla. 3d DCA) (recognizing a “strong public policy favoring arbitration”), review denied sub norm. Fairways Plaza Associates v. Commercial Construction Corp., 419 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1982); Lalow v. Codomo, 101 So.2d 390, 393 (Fla.1958) (the intention of the parties must be determined from an examination of the whole contract and not from the separate phrases or paragraphs); compare Fischer v. Rodrigues-Capriles, 472 So.2d 1315 (Fla 3d DCA 1985) (a clause in a contract naming the situs for any arbitration hearings was not, per se, an obligation to arbitrate).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
500 So. 2d 248, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/banco-industrial-de-venezuela-ca-v-tpm-international-inc-fladistctapp-1986.