Balzebre v. Pearson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Balzebre v. Pearson

271 So. 2d 788

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1022

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 271 So. 2d 788 (Balzebre v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Balzebre v. Pearson, 271 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for a summary final judgment. Appellants sought to enforce a right of first refusal in connection with the sale of land. The right to a first refusal was not so clear that the trial court can be said to have been in error in denying appellants’ motion for a summary judgment. See Orlando Realty Board Bldg. Corporation v. Hilpert, 93 Fla. 954, 113 So. 100 (1927).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an order denying appellants’ motion for a summary final judgment. Appellants sought to enforce a right of first refusal in connection with the sale of land. The right to a first refusal was not so clear that the trial court can be said to have been in error in denying appellants’ motion for a summary judgment. See Orlando Realty Board Bldg. Corporation v. Hilpert, 93 Fla. 954, 113 So. 100 (1927).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 So. 2d 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balzebre-v-pearson-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack