Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith

246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 335, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1602
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 25, 1918·No. No. 203·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576; Illinois Surety Co. v. United States, 240 U. S. 214, 221; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S, 290, 293-294; (2) Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith, 246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 335, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1602 (1918).

246 U.S. 653 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
276 F. 337 (Fifth Circuit, 1921)