Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith
246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 335, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1602
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. v. Wulf, 226 U. S. 570, 576; Illinois Surety Co. v. United States, 240 U. S. 214, 221; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Renn, 241 U. S, 290, 293-294; (2) Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith, 246 U.S. 653, 38 S. Ct. 335, 62 L. Ed. 922, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1602 (1918).
246 U.S. 653 (Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
276 F. 337 (Fifth Circuit, 1921)