Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kitchin
135 F. 520, 68 C.C.A. 70, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4349
Opinion
We think the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of Pullman’s Palace Car Co. v. King, 99 Fed. 380, 39 C. C. A. 573.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kitchin, 135 F. 520, 68 C.C.A. 70, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 4349 (2d Cir. 1905).
135 F. 520 (Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kitchin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Greenawalt v. American Smelting & Refining Co.
10 F.2d 98 (Ninth Circuit, 1926)
Superior Skylight Co. v. Zerbe Const. Co.
5 F.2d 982 (E.D. New York, 1925)
Superior Skylight Co. v. August Kuhnla, Inc.
265 F. 282 (E.D. New York, 1920)
Wilson & Willard Mfg. Co. v. Union Tool Co.
249 F. 729 (Ninth Circuit, 1918)
American Graphophone Co. v. Gimbel Bros.
234 F. 361 (S.D. New York, 1916)
General Electric Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.
199 F. 169 (D. New Jersey, 1912)
St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. American Street Flushing Mach. Co.
156 F. 574 (Eighth Circuit, 1907)
Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. American Graphophone Co.
151 F. 601 (Second Circuit, 1907)