Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.

277 A.2d 134
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided May 13, 1971·No. 1406-M. P·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

277 A.2d 134 (1971)

Jennie BALME et al.
v.
GOLD-BRO, INC.

No. 1406-M. P.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

May 13, 1971.

William G. Gilroy, Providence, for petitioners.

Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, James K. Irvin, Providence, for respondent.

ORDER

The denial of a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory in nature and not finally dispositive of the case and, absent peculiar circumstances, is not appealable under principles applicable in Rhode Island. Any error in denying summary judgment is rendered harmless by a fair determination of the merits at a trial. See 1 Kent, R.I.Civ.Prac., § 56.12.

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc., 277 A.2d 134 (R.I. 1971).

277 A.2d 134 (Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of McAlpine v. Estate of McAlpine
386 A.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1978)
Notre Dame Cemetery v. Rhode Island State Labor Relations Board
373 A.2d 1194 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)
Allied Building Systems, Inc. v. Westminster Construction Corp.
110 R.I. 906 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1972)