Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.
This text of 277 A.2d 134 (Balme v. Gold-Bro, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jennie BALME et al.
v.
GOLD-BRO, INC.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island.
William G. Gilroy, Providence, for petitioners.
Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, James K. Irvin, Providence, for respondent.
ORDER
The denial of a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory in nature and not finally dispositive of the case and, absent peculiar circumstances, is not appealable under principles applicable in Rhode Island. Any error in denying summary judgment is rendered harmless by a fair determination of the merits at a trial. See 1 Kent, R.I.Civ.Prac., § 56.12.
The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.2d 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balme-v-gold-bro-inc-ri-1971.