Ballard v. State

458 So. 2d 796, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2227, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15555
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1984·No. No. 84-954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Mabry v. Johnson, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2543, 81 L.Ed.2d 437 (1984). Cf. State v. Borrego, 445 So.2d 666 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (in the absence of detrimental reliance on State’s agreement not to prosecute, defendant not entitled to specifically enforce the agreement).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. State, 458 So. 2d 796, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2227, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15555 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 796 (Ballard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hoyt
11 Fla. Supp. 2d 147 (Palm Beach County Court, 1985)
Smith v. DANIEL MONES, PA
458 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)