Ballard v. State

447 So. 2d 1040
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 6, 1984·No. 83-46·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

447 So.2d 1040 (1984)

Carl L. BALLARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 83-46.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 6, 1984.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Amelia G. Brown, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

LEHAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for shooting into an occupied dwelling in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (1981), contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge. We affirm.

*1041 In denying the motion to dismiss, the trial court disagreed with Golden v. State, 120 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1960). We agree with the trial court that on a motion to dismiss the element of wantonly shooting at or into a building is not negated by the pleaded facts that defendant fired at a man who was in front of the building. "Wantonly" does not require that the building be the target.

AFFIRMED.

OTT, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ballard v. State, 447 So. 2d 1040 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

447 So. 2d 1040 (Ballard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kettell
980 So. 2d 1061 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
Kettell v. State
950 So. 2d 505 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Skinner v. State
470 So. 2d 702 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Carter v. State
469 So. 2d 775 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
C.H. v. State
460 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Polite v. State
454 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Skinner v. State
450 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)