Ballard v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
This text of 410 S.E.2d 49 (Ballard v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ballard appeals the grant of summary judgment to MARTA on the issue of MARTA’s liability for punitive damages in his personal injury suit. The trial court held MARTA could not be liable for punitive damages as a “pure question of law.”
The bus driven by MARTA driver Sims crossed the centerline and struck Ballard’s car head-on, causing Ballard serious injury. Sims’ foot was caught between the brake and gas pedals after his foot slipped off the pedals because there were no rubber pads on them. He said MARTA did not consider missing pads a mechanical defect of the type that would take a bus out of service for repairs and buses were routinely driven with bare metal pedals.
This issue is controlled in MARTA’s favor by MARTA v. Bos[881]*881well, 261 Ga. 427 (405 SE2d 869) (1991).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
410 S.E.2d 49, 200 Ga. App. 880, 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 1157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ballard-v-metropolitan-atlanta-rapid-transit-authority-gactapp-1991.