Balfour v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railroad

62 Miss. 508
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The second instruction asked by the appellant should have been given. Not the value of the strip of land taken as a strip alone was the criterion of compensation, but its value in relation to the whole tract of which it was a part. A parcel of land in that shape might in itself be of little value, when in connection with that from which it was severed its value would be great. The proper measure of damages is the difference in value of the whole tract before and after the taking of the strip by the appellee.

According to the only evidence of valuation of the land before the jury, the sum allowed the appellant was less than is necessary to make her whole with reference to the damage done her by the appropriation of her land to the use of the appellee.

Decree reversed, new trial granted, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Balfour v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railroad, 62 Miss. 508 (Mich. 1885).

62 Miss. 508 (Balfour v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pearl River Valley Water Supply District v. Wood
172 So. 2d 196 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
PEARL RIV. VLY. WAT. SUP. DIST. v. Wood
172 So. 2d 196 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Hillman
198 So. 565 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
State Highway Commission v. Day
180 So. 794 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)