Baldwin v. State

556 So. 2d 410, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6203, 1989 WL 133485
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baldwin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 So. 2d 173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 1989·No. No. 88-2596·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE: MOTION TO VACATE OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We recall our mandate issued July 25, 1989, 545 So.2d 526.

Subsequent to our opinion in this case, the State located the trial court’s written order containing findings of fact to support its contempt order. The order apparently had been misfiled in the Broward County clerk’s office. Since our only directive to the trial court was to prepare an order containing written findings of fact, when such an order had already been prepared by the trial court, our original opinion now serves no purpose.

Based upon the record and order which now supplements the record on appeal, we affirm.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. State, 556 So. 2d 410, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2573, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6203, 1989 WL 133485 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

556 So. 2d 410 (Baldwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.