Baldwin v. State

545 So. 2d 526, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1615, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3790, 1989 WL 73800
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baldwin v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 So. 2d 173
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1989·No. No. 88-2596·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment of contempt and remand to the trial court for the entry of written findings supporting the judgment of contempt. We distinguish this case from In re Weinstein, 518 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). which did not require a remand for written findings, because the record in this case is neither clear nor complete.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin v. State, 545 So. 2d 526, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1615, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3790, 1989 WL 73800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

545 So. 2d 526 (Baldwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Weinstein
518 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)