Baldwin v. State

545 So. 2d 526, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1615, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3790, 1989 WL 73800
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 1989
DocketNo. 88-2596
StatusPublished

This text of 545 So. 2d 526 (Baldwin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baldwin v. State, 545 So. 2d 526, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1615, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3790, 1989 WL 73800 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment of contempt and remand to the trial court for the entry of written findings supporting the judgment of contempt. We distinguish this case from In re Weinstein, 518 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). which did not require a remand for written findings, because the record in this case is neither clear nor complete.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Weinstein
518 So. 2d 1370 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 So. 2d 526, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1615, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3790, 1989 WL 73800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.