Balbach v. Central School District No. 1

278 A.D. 710, 103 N.Y.S.2d 342
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 710 (Balbach v. Central School District No. 1) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Balbach v. Central School District No. 1, 278 A.D. 710, 103 N.Y.S.2d 342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Appeal by the school district from an order granting respondent’s application for leave to serve a notice of claim after the expiration of sixty days, the statutory period then provided by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Order affirmed, without costs. The accident happened on September 30,. 1949, when the infant was seventeen years old. The school authorities knew about the accident immediately after it happened. About three weeks after the occurrence, claimant’s father reported the accident personally to the principal of the school and the president of the school district. On November 1, 1949, the insurance carrier for the school district received a statement in writing, signed by the claimant, as to the facts of the accident. The insurance investigator told claimant and his father that he would examine into the case and attempt to settle it. Thereafter the investigator visited the claimant and his father periodically and made offers of settlement, which were increased from $2,500 to $5,000, during which time he stated that if the claimant hired an attorney, the attorney would receive 50% of the settlement. When settlement could not be had, claimant and his father consulted an attorney on September 26, 1950. An order to show cause for leave to serve the notice of claim was served on September 30, 1950, the last day on which a motion could effectively be made. Under, the peculiar circumstances of this case, the discretion of the Special Term was properly exercised in favor of the granting of the motion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chikara v. City of New York
21 Misc. 2d 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Friend v. County of Onondaga
12 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Newman v. City of Geneva
2 Misc. 2d 646 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
Biancoviso v. City of New York
285 A.D. 320 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 710, 103 N.Y.S.2d 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/balbach-v-central-school-district-no-1-nyappdiv-1951.