Bakersfield Broadcasting Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Marietta Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor
This text of 266 F.2d 697 (Bakersfield Broadcasting Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Marietta Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BAKERSFIELD BROADCASTING COMPANY, Petitioner
v.
UNITED STATES of America and
Federal Communications Commission, Respondents, Marietta Broadcasting, Inc., Intervenor.
No. 14541.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1959.
Decided May 14, 1959.
On Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Communications Commission.
Mr. Ben C. Fisher, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Charles V. Wayland, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner.
Mr. Charles F. Duvall, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for petitioner.
Mr. Jerry M. Hamovit, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, with whom Messrs. John L. Fitzgerald, Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, Richard A. Solomon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, at the time brief was filed, Mrs. Ruth V. Reel, Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, and Mr. Henry Geller, Counsel, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents.
Mr. Daniel M. Friedman, Atty., Dept. of Justice, also entered an appearance for respondents.
Mr. Herbert E. Forrest, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Vincent B. Welch, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for intervenor.
Before EDGERTON, WASHINGTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner complains of orders of the Federal Communications Commission assigning certain UHF channels to Bakersfield, California, and of the Commission's failure to take action in certain other pending matters. We find no error. On the authority of Jacksonville Journal Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 246 F.2d 699, a case presenting an essentially similar situation, the orders of the Commission will be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 F.2d 697, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 293, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakersfield-broadcasting-company-v-united-states-o-cadc-1959.