Bakersfield Broadcasting Co. v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Bakersfield Broadcasting Co. v. United States

266 F.2d 697, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 293

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 1959

DocketNo. 14541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 F.2d 697 (Bakersfield Broadcasting Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bakersfield Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 266 F.2d 697, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 293 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner complains of orders of the Federal Communications Commission assigning certain UHF channels to Bakersfield, California, and of the Commission’s failure to take action in certain other pending matters. We find no error. On the authority of Jacksonville Journal Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 246 F.2d 699, a case presenting an essentially similar situation, the orders of the Commission will be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner complains of orders of the Federal Communications Commission assigning certain UHF channels to Bakersfield, California, and of the Commission’s failure to take action in certain other pending matters. We find no error. On the authority of Jacksonville Journal Co. v. Federal Communications Commission, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 12, 246 F.2d 699, a case presenting an essentially similar situation, the orders of the Commission will be

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F.2d 697, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bakersfield-broadcasting-co-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack