Baker v. State

238 S.W. 226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Tex. Crim. 305
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 1922·No. No. 6663·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Bell county of possessing equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

That feature of the Dean Law (Acts 36th Leg. 1st & 2d Callen Sess. [1919] c. 78), making penal the possession of equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, having been repealed by ' its omission from the amended sections of said statute passed by the First Called Session of the Thirty-Seventh Legislature (Acts 37th Leg. 1st Called Sess. [1921] c. 61), under the numerous authorities we are compelled to reverse and dismiss the instant prosecution, and it is so ordered. Francis v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 235 S. W. 580; Petit v. State. (Tex. Cr. App.) 235 S. W. 579.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 238 S.W. 226 (Tex. 1922).

238 S.W. 226 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U. S. Petit v. State
235 S.W. 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)