Baker v. State

238 S.W. 226, 91 Tex. Crim. 186, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 117
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 Tex. Crim. 305
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 1, 1922·No. No. 6663.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

—Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Bell County of possessing equipment for the manufacture of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at three years in the penitentiary.

That feature of the Dean Law making penal the possession of equipment for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, having been repealed by its omission from the amended sections of said statute passed by the Second Called Session of the Thirty-seventh Legislature, under the numerous authorities we are compelled to reverse and dismiss the instant prosecution, and it is so ordered. Francis v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 67, 235 S. W. Rep. 580; Petit v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 336, 235 S. W. Rep. 579.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. State, 238 S.W. 226, 91 Tex. Crim. 186, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 117 (Tex. 1922).

238 S.W. 226 (Baker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Francis v. State
233 S.W. 974 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
U. S. Petit v. State
235 S.W. 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Francis v. State
235 S.W. 580 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)